home Contact
Welcome

[Washington, DC – January 13, 2005]

Next Wednesday a two-story house will get jolted as if it were struck by the world's strongest earthquake to test how it will perform in seismically active regions of the world. The experiment will take place in a huge laboratory room with a "table" to shake the house, January 19 at Trentec Inc. in Cincinnati, Ohio. Media may observe the test by calling in advance. Afterwards, the scientists and developer involved will be available, with video clips, to say how the structure held up. This physical test will complement computer simulations and other data that showed the housing system to be highly resistant to seismic forces.

The Federation of American Scientists is sponsoring the shake table test to further research the structural system design. It has already been shown to be cost-effective, safe in fire and wind, and environmentally friendly. FAS is searching for a non-proprietary housing technology to answer the need for housing in poor regions like Indonesia and Afghanistan, where millions now live in mud brick structures that become death traps in earthquakes. And with modest modifications the technology can also be used to build elegant houses in the United States that meet the most stringent earthquake and wind standards. A test house will be built in Houston this spring.

"If the house were made of mud bricks, it would fall down in the test. If it were made with wood framing, it would probably fall. We think that this system may be far stronger," explains Rachel Jagoda, the FAS Housing Technology Project Director.

The two-story, two-room structure has roof and walls made from panels of expanded polystyrene, similar to commercial Styrofoam found in coffee cups and packing peanuts. The 4' x 8' polystyrene panels are cladded with cement board (see Background, next page). Though they are fairly light, the panels are stronger than conventional housing materials. They are cheap and can be assembled into houses with relatively unskilled labor. The system to be tested is certified already by the International Code Council and can be used for homes in the United States.

The FAS arranged the shake-table test to further examine the system's performance in the largest earthquakes.
In Wednesday's test, a hydraulic motor will shake the structure in three directions. The shaking may become as violent as a Richter scale 10 earthquake. This would be ten times larger than the Richter scale 9 earthquake on December 26 that caused the devastating tsunami across South Asia. The largest earthquake on record was a Richter scale 9.5 that struck Chile in 1960. The largest one in continental United States was Richter scale 8.7 in Missouri in 1811 in which one person died.

H.H. "Hoot" Haddock, the engineer who devised the system, says: "We have buildings in Alaska that are 20 years old that have been under very heavy snow loads, seen over 200 mph winds and regular earthquakes up to Richter 7. These buildings have zero damage after 20 years."

Background
The house to be tested has walls and roof made from structural insulated panels (SIP), an innovative housing technology. The wood-free design uses an energy-efficient core of expanded polystyrene (EPS) coated with commercial cement board that requires no framing. The manufacturing process is simple enough to be adapted in poor regions which have relatively unskilled labor. The EPS is first molded into planks which can be of different thicknesses. The cement board is then affixed with a high-strength glue dried under pressure.

The Federation of American Scientists Housing Technology Project was begun by FAS after devastating earthquakes in Turkey and Afghanistan killed thousands of people whose homes collapsed. Traditional homes there and elsewhere are made from mud bricks and often collapse during moderate quakes. The FAS project set out to find a housing system that would be low-cost, compatible with any architectural style, energy-efficient, safe against high winds, earthquakes, fire, insects and mold.

For foreign production it was essential that the amount of imported materials be kept to a minimum. The system selected can provide a wide range of housing from simple "starter homes" for refugees to elegant houses with complex architectural features that can provide safe, energy efficient housing throughout the United States.
FAS called on experts in structural engineering, energy efficiency, indoor air quality, manufacturing, and housing in developing countries. Experts selected the cement board-EPS core panel as the first product to explore as a possible solution. The panels in the house being tested Wednesday are sold under the name Thermasave and made by IHSN Inc., of Florence, Alabama. FAS' previous tests of these panels have shown them to be: fire-safe; structurally sound in wind, snow, and other extreme conditions; energy-efficient; resistant to pests and mold; and highly cost-effective.

The project has been highlighted in many media including BBC World News and Forbes magazine.

The Housing Technology Project also plans to build a model home with the technology in Houston, Texas later this year. Demonstration homes are likely in Afghanistan. The project is looking for ways to collaborate with those engaged in reconstruction in South Asia.


SIPS & SURVIVING NATURAL DISASTERS
During 1998, The Worldwatch Institute reported that worldwide natural disasters set an unfortunate record, costing property owners about $70 billion, or more than the total cost of all the natural disasters during the 1980s decade. Awareness about these huge cost figures has a way of filtering down to the community level. Homeowners, building code organizations, and, to an increasing degree, insurance companies are becoming more aware of the potential for increasingly costly damage, which can result from seemingly more frequent natural disasters, many of them caused by extreme weather events.

Gerald E. Sherwood, with the Forest products laboratory (Madison, Wisconsin) has written that the “outstanding structural feature (of SIPs) also offer a solution for buildings to resist the forces of natural disasters, such as earthquakes and hurricanes.” While the evidence is growing in support of this statement, the actual survival of SIP structures through natural disasters has not been as carefully documented as one would like in order to make this a bombproof case and then apply dollar value to it.


The following stories are reprinted from various sources and represent reports of the SIPs industry in general:

Earthquakes

Kobe: In January 1993, a severe earthquake – hitting 7.2 on the Richter scale – devastated Kobe, a Japanese city of 1.5 million people located southwest of Tokyo, So-called “quake-proof” elevated highways toppled, railways were destroyed, and entire blocks of houses leveled. More than 5,000 died and hundreds of thousands were left homeless.

Since SIPs developed a reputation as an unusually strong building system, during the 1990s a growing number of Japanese purchased homes with SIPs built by US manufacturers.
It was documented that six three-story homes, all built with SIP panels, were located between 10 and 20 miles from the quake’s epicenter. All six homes survived with no structural damage, and their brick and stucco facades remained intact; but several neighboring homes were reported to have suffered either serious structural or cosmetic damage.

Upon learning how well these homes survived the Kobe quake, Taisei Corporation’s housing division decided to contract for SIPs from the US. Yasuhiro Morita, general manager of Taisci’s housing division, was quoted in early 1998 as follows: “Even the newer homes in the area built to much more strict standards failed miserably when compared to the panel homes. We decided the time was right to bring [SIP] panels to Japan.”

Guam: On August 8, 1993, an earthquake that measure 8.1 on the Richter scale – the world’s strongest earthquake in four years – struck Guam. According to Donald Dickens (ThermaSteel Corporation), there was “quite a bit of structural damage to all high-rise buildings on the island”; two hotels were mostly down and a number of bridges were destroyed. Damage to homes was more limited. Dickens reported that the only damage to housing stock built with their Thermastructure system was a number of hairline cracks in the stucco exterior finishes.

After this same earthquake, Fred Prinz inspected many of the units he had built with SIPs from Moensy International. His report confirmed the damage reported by Dickens; Prinz added: “I found no evidence of any damage to any (SIP) structure at all. The buildings rode the earthquake so well that I could not even find hairline cracks in the drywall taping.”

Sakhalin Island (Russia): During 1996, Sakhalin Island suffered an extremely damaging earthquake. That quake stimulated more studies of building strength. The Russians studied their panels in great detail. The outcome: the Russian engineers said [SIP] panels would survive a zone-8 earthquake.

Straight-Line Winds

Michigan: While the winds most damaging to buildings tend to be tied to extreme weather events such as hurricanes, tornadoes, and typhoons, even strong “straight-line” winds, can tear off roofs and knock down walls. Such a wind struck the Midwest during the summer of 1998, damaging or destroying hundreds of structures and leaving 400,000 homes without power.
Near Coopersville, Michigan, Larry and Valerie VanZomeren’s home endured winds that ranged between 80 and 130 mph. The VanZomerens lost hundreds of mature trees on their property. But the big worry was five trees, all over 80 feet tall with diameters between 12 and 16 inches that fell directly on the house. Despite over 10 tons of trees having fallen on their house – built with SIPs – the home suffered no structural damage. While the home required repairs to some siding and shingles, plus a new set of French doors, the VanZomerens were amazed the house didn’t even have any drywall cracked. “I’m certain that a stick-frame house wouldn’t have (withstood) that kind of force,” said VanZomeren.

Hurricanes

Homestead, Florida: In August 1992, Andrew – the most destructive hurricane in US history – tore into Homestead a suburb and Air Force base southwest of Miami. It flattened thousands of structures. Yet on 125th Street, a church and parsonage built with SIP panels survived without structural damage. Because it was one of the few large buildings in the area to come through virtually unscathed, it was used as a distribution center for food and other supplies. A ranger station in Homestead – another structure built with SIP panels also suffered no structural damage.

Franklin
, Louisiana: After Andrew ravaged south Florida, it moved back out over the Gulf of Mexico, regained its category-5 wind speeds, moved northwest, and slammed into the Mississippi Delta on August 26, 1992. The town of Franklin was hit by 160+ mph winds for five hours. (The storm destroyed the wind gauge before comments about 200-mph gusts could be verified.) A home built with SIPl panels – 4-inch walls and 6-inch ceilings – survived with minor damage to the ceiling of the attached porch but no structural damage. Some wind-driven rain blew up through holes in the porch ceiling and collected in the attic on top of the ceiling panels beneath a conventionally framed roof above). One home owner was pleased that the water didn’t soak down through the panels: in fact, the ceiling drywall was unmarred. By comparison, he reported that several garages and one house on his block were destroyed, and within a half-mile of his home numerous houses were destroyed.

Charleston
, South Carolina: A category-4 hurricane (Hugo) struck Charleston in 1989 with a vengeance, causing over a billion dollars worth of damage to buildings, roads, and other infrastructure. Three cottages built with floor, wall, and ceiling panels from SIPs withstood the hurricane with no structural damage, while adjacent homes suffered serious structural damage, including loss of roofs and walls. The cottages had been completed just a few months earlier through the Mayor’s Council on the Homeless project for low-income residents. The fact that they suffered nothing more than minor shingle loss led to an order for seven additional cottages.

Hampstead
, North Carolina: In August 1998, for 24 straight hours Hurricane Bonnie delivered sustained winds over 100 mph along the North Carolina coast. A home being built with SIP panels was framed, sided, shingled, and dry walled, but not yet finished. Through it all, the only loss the house experienced was a broken bathroom window and minor water damage. The 1,300sf ranch, made with SIP floors, walls and cathedral ceiling, didn’t suffer any drywall cracking. The home next door lost siding, facia and 80% of its shingles.

Homosassa Springs
, Florida: Having spent part of his life out on petroleum drilling rigs in the Gulf of Mexico, Douglas Elvers wanted a home that would withstand a 175-mph wind without forcing him to evacuate. He chose wall and ceiling panels from Enercept, then connected them to a steel/concrete floor and pier system with steel pins and cables. Due to the high water that can hit houses in the area, the Elvers house is up on 10-foot stilts. The bay where the Elvers live on Florida’s west coast gets hit routinely with 80 to 90-mph winds and storm surges every few years; in fact, the Elvers were hit three times with hurricanes during their first year in the home. While they lost seven trees during one hurricane and they saw a few nearby trailers tipped over, the house itself sustained no damage. “Even when it’s blowing like crazy outside, we don’t feel any shivering or motion".

 
ENVIROFAB :: Box 2678 :: 306 - 9th Ave. West :: Cardston, AB T0K 0K0 :: 1-877-GREEN-36
Home | Products | FAQs | Project Archive | Contact
Website Designed by Ridgeline Media Ridgeline Media